Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011

Arnold v. State

Arnold v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided October 11, 2011 · Welsh, Smart, Ellis
350 S.W.3d 65; 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1311; 2011 WL 4762053 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Arnold v. State

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Harvey Arnold challenges the .trial court’s denial of his motion to reopen Rule 29.15 post-conviction proceedings. He contends his post-conviction counsel abandoned him by filing an amended post-conviction motion advancing only claims that were either already argued on direct appeal or claims that were restated verbatim from his Rule 29.15 motion. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.