Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011

State v. Douglas

Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided May 31, 2011 · Pfeiffer, Newton, Ahuja

341 S.W.3d 820; 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 745; 2011 WL 2118806 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

In the Matter of Welch (Mo. Ct. App. 2011)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Jack Douglas was convicted of driving with a revoked driver’s license. He appeals, arguing that the trial court committed reversible error by allowing hearsay statements into evidence, and that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel due to his attorney’s failure to object to certain hearsay statements. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 30.25(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.