GERSTNER EX REL. LUSTER v. Matheny
GERSTNER EX REL. LUSTER v. Matheny
347 S.W.3d 550; 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 816; 2011 WL 2413000
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
GERSTNER EX REL. LUSTER v. Matheny
Opinion
ORDER
Camille Gerstner, by and through her next friend, Kirsten Luster, (Appellant) appeals from the circuit court’s judgment granting Lisa Matheny and Jaclyn Hill’s motion to dismiss. We have reviewed de novo the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we find Appellant’s claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) (2011).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.