Order

Dawud Abdelmalik appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing by the Circuit Court of Jackson County (“motion court”). On appeal, he claims that the motion court erred in determining that his trial counsel (“Counsel”) was not constitutionally ineffective in failing to raise claims that: (1) Abdelmalik’s second trial was in violation of the double-jeopardy protections in the United States and Missouri Constitutions; and (2) section 650.055 RSMo, as applied to the collection of Ab-delmalik’s DNA sample, violates the Missouri Constitution’s prohibition against laws that operate retrospectively. We affirm the judgment of the motion court. Rule 84.16(b).