Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011

Bishop v. State

Bishop v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided August 30, 2011 · Welsh, Ellis, Smart
345 S.W.3d 901; 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1112; 2011 WL 3802177 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Bishop v. State

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

James Bishop appeals from the dismissal of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-eon-viction relief. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.