Jackson v. Ross
Jackson v. Ross
Opinion
ORDER
The plaintiffs, homebuyers Douglas and Cary Jackson, appeal the judgment en *443 tered by the Circuit Court of St. Charles County against them and in favor of the defendants, sellers John Ross and Janet Tursi, and home inspector Regional Home Inspection Company. 1 We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal, and find no error.
An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. We affirm the trial court’s judgment. Rule 84.16(b)(1).
. Janet Tursi had filed a cross-claim against John Ross for indemnity, but the trial transcript confirms that she abandoned this cross-claim.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.