Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011

ECHOLES v. State

ECHOLES v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided September 13, 2011 · Dowd, Hoff, Sullivan
348 S.W.3d 119; 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1202; 2011 WL 4036515 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

ECHOLES v. State

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Carlos Echóles appeals from the motion court’s Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, Order and Judgment (judgment) denying his Rule 24.035 Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Judgment and Sentence and Request for Evidentiary Hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential or precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the trial court’s judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.