Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011

Hood v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided December 6, 2011 · Pfeiffer, Howard, Martin

353 S.W.3d 475; 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1611; 2011 WL 6258456 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

ASHING v. State (Mo. Ct. App. 2011)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Steven Hood appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 24.035 motion for postconviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. In his sole point on appeal, Hood claims that his guilty plea was not knowing, voluntary, and intelligent because the plea court failed to establish a factual basis for the plea. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.