Tillman v. State
Tillman v. State
361 S.W.3d 441; 2011 WL 5921451
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Tillman v. State
Opinion
ORDER
Marshall Tillman appeals from the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion. Tillman claims that the motion court clearly erred because he received ineffective assistance of counsel. Tillman contends that trial counsel failed to specifically and contemporaneously object to the testimony of the current medical examiner who testified regarding the conclusions that a former medical examiner reached about the cause of death of the victim. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.