Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011

Chism v. State

Chism v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided June 28, 2011 · Ellis, Howard, Newton
343 S.W.3d 368; 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 915; 2011 WL 2565387 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Chism v. State

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Charles Chism appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. Chism sought to vacate his convictions for forcible rape, section 566.030, RSMo Cum.Supp.2011, forcible sodomy, section 566.060, RSMo Cum.Supp.2011, and two counts of domestic assault in the second degree, section 565.073, RSMo Cum.Supp.2011, and two concurrent fifteen year sentences and two concurrent seven year sentences. On appeal, he claims ineffective assistance of appellate and trial counsel. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.