Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011

King v. State

King v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided May 24, 2011 · Gaertner, Hoff, Cohen
341 S.W.3d 806; 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 718; 2011 WL 2020707 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

King v. State

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Antoine King (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order (judgment) denying his Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence and Judgment, filed pursuant to Rule 29.15, on his convictions for two counts of first-degree murder, two counts of armed criminal action, one count of first-degree robbery, and one count of first-degree assault. We affirm the motion court’s judgment.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value or serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.