Vice v. State
Vice v. State
345 S.W.3d 398; 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1066; 2011 WL 3569822
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Vice v. State
Opinion
ORDER
Chad Vice appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 1 motion. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court’s denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
1
. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2011, unless otherwise indicated.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.