Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011

Vice v. State

Vice v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided August 16, 2011 · Ahrens, Richter, Gaertner
345 S.W.3d 398; 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1066; 2011 WL 3569822 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Vice v. State

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Chad Vice appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 1 motion. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court’s denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2011, unless otherwise indicated.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.