State v. Ater
State v. Ater
351 S.W.3d 246; 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1419; 2011 WL 5064303
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
State v. Ater
Opinion
ORDER
David A. Ater appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of second-degree murder and kidnapping. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court committed no error, plain or otherwise. Rule 30.20; 1 State v. Washington, 260 S.W.3d 875, 879 (Mo.App. E.D. 2008). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
1
. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2010, unless otherwise indicated.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.