Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011

Daniele v. Missouri Department of Conservation

Daniele v. Missouri Department of Conservation
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided May 3, 2011 · Dowd, Mooney, Gaertner
347 S.W.3d 486; 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 626; 2011 WL 1713457 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Daniele v. Missouri Department of Conservation

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiffs, Anthony and Beth Dan-iele, appeal the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of St. Louis County against them and in favor of the defendant, the Missouri Department of Conservation, on the Department’s counterclaim for breach of agreement. Finding no error, we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this *487 decision. We affirm the trial court’s judgment. Rule 84.16(b)(5).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.