Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011

Marin v. State

Marin v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided April 12, 2011 · Gaertner, Hoff, Cohen
340 S.W.3d 306; 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 505; 2011 WL 1530723 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Marin v. State

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Isaiah Marin (Movant), alleging the plea court failed to determine whether a seven year plea offer had been made to Movant, appeals from the motion court’s Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Judgment (Judgment) denying his motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value or serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.