HARDGE v. State
HARDGE v. State
359 S.W.3d 131; 2011 WL 6755921; 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1730
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
HARDGE v. State
Opinion
ORDER
Raymond Hardge appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Hardge contends the motion court clearly erred in denying his claim that plea counsel was ineffective for failing to conduct DNA and fingerprint testing. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the motion court’s judgment.
AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.