Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011

Orr v. Arcand

Orr v. Arcand
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided September 20, 2011 · Ahrens, Richter, Gaertner
348 S.W.3d 830; 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1243; 2011 WL 4373940 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Orr v. Arcand

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

David Orr (Appellant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment granting the motion to dismiss filed by Joe Arcand and Tom Clements (collectively, Respondents). We have reviewed de novo the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we find Appellant’s claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) (2011).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.