ORDER

Ryan Hettenhausen appeals the judgment of the trial court upholding the administrative revocation of his driving privileges for refusal to submit to a chemical analysis of his breath. He contends that the evidence was insufficient to show that the arresting officer had reasonable grounds to believe that he was driving a motor vehicle while intoxicated. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

*311 The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).