Livingston v. State
Livingston v. State
365 S.W.3d 311; 2012 WL 1499904; 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 603
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Livingston v. State
Opinion
ORDER
Lance Livingston appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based upon findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. A formal, published opinion would have no precedential value; however, a memoran *312 dum explaining the reason for our decision has been provided to the parties.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.