Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012

Livingston v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided May 1, 2012 · Division Two: Gary D. Witt, Presiding Judge, Joseph M. Ellis, Judge and Mark D. Pfeiffer, Judge

365 S.W.3d 311; 2012 WL 1499904; 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 603 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

State v. Witt (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Lance Livingston appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based upon findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. A formal, published opinion would have no precedential value; however, a memoran *312 dum explaining the reason for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.