Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012

In Re Marriage of Soskin

In Re Marriage of Soskin
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided February 21, 2012 · Crane, Kathianne, Kenneth, Knaup, Lawrence, Mooney, Romines
359 S.W.3d 542; 2012 WL 549655 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

In Re Marriage of Soskin

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Husband, Alan R. Soskin, acting pro se, appeals from a decree of dissolution of marriage. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.