Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012

Boehm v. State

Boehm v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided April 24, 2012 · Ahrens, Richter, Gaertner
365 S.W.3d 616; 2012 WL 1416624; 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 540 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Boehm v. State

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Andrew Boehm appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15 1 motion. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court’s denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) (2011).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2011, unless otherwise indicated.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.