Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012

Wingo v. State

Wingo v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided February 14, 2012 · Crane, Mooney, Romines
358 S.W.3d 586; 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 170; 2012 WL 453739 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Wingo v. State

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Dwayne Wingo, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.