Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012

Durham v. State

Durham v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided April 17, 2012 · Smart, Howard, Newton
365 S.W.3d 603; 2012 WL 1288723; 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 524 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Durham v. State

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Mr. Ronald Durham appeals the denial of a Rule 29.15 post-conviction relief motion. He claims that trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to properly advise him of the constitutional right to testify and failing to object to improper evidence of prior, uncharged misconduct.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.