Durham v. State
Durham v. State
365 S.W.3d 603; 2012 WL 1288723; 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 524
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- State v. Hill (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
ORDER
Mr. Ronald Durham appeals the denial of a Rule 29.15 post-conviction relief motion. He claims that trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to properly advise him of the constitutional right to testify and failing to object to improper evidence of prior, uncharged misconduct.
For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.