Miller v. State
Miller v. State
365 S.W.3d 652; 2012 WL 1623484; 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 609
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Miller v. State
Opinion
ORDER
Kristopher Miller appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. The motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(2) & (5).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.