Kuta v. Kaminsky
Kuta v. Kaminsky
363 S.W.3d 134; 2012 WL 123279; 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 46
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Kuta v. Kaminsky
Opinion
ORDER
Randall Kuta, doing business as Life-tyme Exteriors, (“Plaintiff’) appeals from the trial court’s judgment, directing a verdict in favor of defendants Sheri Kamin-sky, Oscar Hantz, and Don Anderson, doing business as Anderson Building Co., and against Plaintiff on Plaintiffs Petition for Damages. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.