Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012

Woolfolk v. State

Woolfolk v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided March 20, 2012 · Ahrens, Richter, Gaertner
362 S.W.3d 489; 2012 WL 944612; 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 377 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Woolfolk v. State

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Orlando Woolfolk, Sr., appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 1 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court’s denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(h), (k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). Mo. R. Civ. P. (2011).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P. (2011), unless otherwise indicated.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.