Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012

State v. Tatum

State v. Tatum
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided May 1, 2012 · Division Two: Gary D. Witt, Presiding Judge, Joseph M. Ellis, Judge and Mark D. Pfeiffer, Judge
365 S.W.3d 643 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

State v. Tatum

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Lance Livingston appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we *644 conclude that the judgment is based upon findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. A formal, published opinion would have no precedential value; however, a memorandum explaining the reason for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.