Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012

Hickey v. State

Hickey v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided June 5, 2012 · Crane, Mooney, Romines
367 S.W.3d 648; 2012 WL 1994991; 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 755 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Hickey v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Pietro Frank Hickey, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits *649his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing on remand. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.