Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012

Barker v. State

Barker v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided July 10, 2012 · Howard, Smart, Welsh
369 S.W.3d 807; 2012 WL 2732579; 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 889 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Barker v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Eric R. Barker appeals from a judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. Barker sought to set aside his guilty plea to one count each of keeping or maintaining a public nuisance (section 195.130 RSMo) and possession of a controlled substance (section 195.202 RSMo). Barker now asserts that he was denied due process of law because the trial court accepted his guilty plea without a factual basis having been demonstrated for maintaining a public nuisance. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.