Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012

Hellems v. State

Hellems v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided April 3, 2012 · Dowd, Hoff, Sullivan
371 S.W.3d 23; 2012 WL 1114723; 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 447 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Hellems v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Oney Hellems (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 24.0351, following an eviden-tiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2010, unless otherwise indicated.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.