Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012

Wade v. State

Wade v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided August 28, 2012 · Dowd, Quigless, Richter
374 S.W.3d 400; 2012 WL 3663140; 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1025 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Wade v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Robbie Wade appeals from a judgment in the Circuit Court of St. Louis County denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing.

In his sole point on appeal, Movant alleges that the motion court clearly erred in denying his post-conviction motion because his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate to determine whether Mov-ant had a viable good cause defense to the charged offenses and for advising Movant to plead guilty when there was a good cause defense available. We find no error and affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment of the motion court pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.