Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012

Fleis v. State

Fleis v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided September 18, 2012 · Ahrens, Norton, Sullivan
380 S.W.3d 611; 2012 WL 4078917; 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1154 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Fleis v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Robert W. Fleis (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 29.15 (post-conviction motion).1 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the motion court denying Movant’s post-conviction motion is supported by the record and was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k); State v. Thompson, 835 S.W.2d 394, 400 (Mo.App. E.D. 1992). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2010.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.