Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012

In re Taylor

In re Taylor
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided September 18, 2012 · Ahrens, Norton, Sullivan
380 S.W.3d 613; 2012 WL 4078919; 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1156 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

In re Taylor

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Stephen Taylor appeals from the probate court’s judgment after a jury trial committing him to secure confinement in the custody of the Missouri Department of Mental Health as a sexually violent predator. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that there was sufficient evidence from which a reasonable fact finder could have found each necessary element by clear and convincing evidence. In re A.B., 334 S.W.3d 746, 752 (Mo.App. E.D. 2011). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the decision pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.