Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012

State v. Kyles

Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided October 2, 2012 · Dowd, Quigless, Richter

380 S.W.3d 649; 2012 WL 4499322; 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1226 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Charles Kyles v. State of Missouri (Mo. Ct. App. 2014)
Kyles v. State (Mo. Ct. App. 2014)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Charles Kyles (“Appellant”) appeals from the judgment of his conviction by a jury of tampering with a motor vehicle in the first degree, a class C felony, Section 569.080 RSMo. (Cum.Supp. 2005)1, resisting arrest or interfering with arrest, a class D felony, Section 575.150 RSMo. (Cum.Supp. 2009), and assault on a law enforcement officer in the third degree, a class A misdemeanor, Section 565.083. On appeal, Appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction for felony resisting arrest.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. We find the *650evidence was sufficient to support Appellant’s conviction for felony resisting arrest. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b) Mo.R.Crim. P. (2012).

. All further statutory references will be to RSMo. (Cum.Supp. 2005), unless otherwise indicated.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.