Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012

Bailey v. State

Bailey v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided October 9, 2012 · Amburg, Crane, Hoff
381 S.W.3d 384; 2012 WL 4788421; 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1272 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Bailey v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mareon L. Bailey (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 29.15, following an evidentia-ry hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.