Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012

Flanigan v. State

Flanigan v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided October 16, 2012 · Cohen, Mooney, Odenwald
381 S.W.3d 396; 2012 WL 4883193; 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1296 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Flanigan v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Stephen Flanigan appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(2)&(5).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.