Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012

Lake v. State

Lake v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided October 30, 2012 · Ahuja, Howard, Martin
382 S.W.3d 247; 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1383; 2012 WL 5306981 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Lake v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Howard Lake appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief. Lake sought to vacate his conviction for the class B felony driving while intoxicated (chronic offender), sections 577.010 and 577.023, RSMo Cum.Supp.2011, and sentence of ten years imprisonment. He claims that trial counsel was ineffective in failing to call a witness to testify at trial. Because an opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.