Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012

Kaplan v. Johnson

Kaplan v. Johnson
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided August 7, 2012 · Howard, Martin, Mitchell
384 S.W.3d 711; 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 970; 2012 WL 3171487 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Kaplan v. Johnson

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Elliot and Jeanne Kaplan appeal from the judgment of the trial court in favor of Gareth Johnson, M.D., and Midwest Pathology Associates, LLC, following a jury *712trial on their claims for medical malpractice and loss of consortium. On appeal, they claim that the trial court erred in refusing the verdict director allegedly proffered by them. They also claim that the trial court abused its discretion in preventing them from cross-examining the defendants’ expert witness regarding claims asserted in a pending qui tam complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.