Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012

Rodgers v. State

Rodgers v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided August 28, 2012 · Dowd, Quigless, Richter
385 S.W.3d 493; 2012 WL 3663061; 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1024 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Rodgers v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Cornelius D. Rodgers appeals from the motion court’s denial, without an evidentia-ry hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.