Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012

Housman v. State

Housman v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided November 20, 2012 · Amburg, Crane, Hoff
386 S.W.3d 205; 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1450; 2012 WL 5866498 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Housman v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Merriel E. Housman, Jr. appeals from the motion court’s Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Judgment denying his Rule 29.15 Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Judgment and Sentence following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact and conclusions of law that are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the - parties setting forth the reasons' for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.