Holliday v. State
Holliday v. State
391 S.W.3d 925; 2013 WL 703839; 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 217
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Holliday v. State
Opinion of the Court
Appellant John J. Holliday appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an eviden-tiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. A formal, published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.