Missouri Court of Appeals, 2013

State v. Moorehead

State v. Moorehead
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided February 26, 2013 · Ahrens, Norton, Sullivan
392 S.W.3d 531; 2013 WL 704442; 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 246 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

State v. Moorehead

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Gregory Moorehead (Defendant) appeals the trial court’s judgment entered after a *532jury convicted him of forcible rape and forcible sodomy.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the motion court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.