Missouri Court of Appeals, 2013

Brock v. State

Brock v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided February 26, 2013 · Dowd, Quigless, Richter
392 S.W.3d 534; 2013 WL 704472; 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 252 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Brock v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Keith Brock (“Movant”) appeals from the motion court’s denial, without an evi-dentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 amended motion for post-conviction relief. Movant pleaded guilty to the charges of possession of a controlled substance in two cases in the Circuit Court for the City of St. Louis, and received two concurrent ten-year sentences as a persistent drug offender. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.