Brock v. State
Brock v. State
392 S.W.3d 534; 2013 WL 704472; 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 252
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Brock v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Keith Brock (“Movant”) appeals from the motion court’s denial, without an evi-dentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 amended motion for post-conviction relief. Movant pleaded guilty to the charges of possession of a controlled substance in two cases in the Circuit Court for the City of St. Louis, and received two concurrent ten-year sentences as a persistent drug offender. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.