Missouri Court of Appeals, 2013

Shaw v. State

Shaw v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided February 26, 2013 · Ahrens, Norton, Sullivan
392 S.W.3d 535; 2013 WL 704763; 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 249 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Shaw v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Cory Shaw appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying, without an evi-dentiary hearing, his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 24.035.1 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the *536judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2008, unless otherwise indicated.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.