Missouri Court of Appeals, 2013

Harris v. American Red Cross Blood Services

Harris v. American Red Cross Blood Services
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided March 12, 2013 · Dowd, Quigless, Richter
393 S.W.3d 619; 2013 WL 978710; 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 311 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Harris v. American Red Cross Blood Services

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Pamela Harris (“Claimant”) appeals from the decision of the Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“Commission”) that affirmed a denial of unemployment benefits by the Appeals Tribunal because Claimant was discharged from American Red Cross Blood Services (“Employer”) for misconduct connected with work. We have reviewed the briefs *620of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.