State v. Davis
State v. Davis
397 S.W.3d 487; 2013 WL 602996; 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 202
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
James Davis (“Davis”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment that denied his motion to withdraw a guilty plea pursuant to Rule 29.07(d). Davis argues that the trial court abused its discretion because he suffered manifest injustice in that his defense was prejudicially affected by his trial counsel’s conflict of interest. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.