Missouri Court of Appeals, 2013

Irving v. State

Irving v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided April 16, 2013 · Ahrens, Norton, Sullivan
397 S.W.3d 538; 2013 WL 1739041; 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 466 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Irving v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Antwone D. Irving appeals from the motion court’s denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 29.15.1 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons *539for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2011, unless otherwise indicated.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.