Missouri Court of Appeals, 2013

EHCP Capital, LLC v. Siedlund Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided April 30, 2013 · Amburg, Crane, Hoff

398 S.W.3d 93; 2013 WL 1803921; 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 515 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

EHCP Capital, LLC (EHCP) appeals from the judgment, following a bench trial, finding against EHCP on its claim for enforcement of a promissory note and awarding attorney’s fees and costs to the Siedlund Company. We affirm.1

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claim of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

. Siedlund's motion for attorney’s fees and costs on appeal is granted and remanded to the trial court for determination per separate order of this court.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.