Missouri Court of Appeals, 2013

Moore v. State

Moore v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided July 9, 2013 · Cohen, Mooney, Odenwald
403 S.W.3d 681; 2013 WL 3477286; 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 824 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Moore v. State

Opinion of the Court

*682ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The movant, Jeffrey Moore, appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for postcon-viction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

We affirm the motion court’s order denying the movant’s Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.