Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Missouri Court of Appeals, 2013

Brooks v. State

Brooks v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided August 20, 2013 · Gaertner, III, Mullen
406 S.W.3d 489; 2013 WL 4419410; 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 954 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Brooks v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jasmine Brooks appeals from the judgment denying her Rule 24.0351 motion. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court’s denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value.. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b).

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2012, unless otherwise indicated.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑